Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
News Bulletin
 Swine Flu - Online Discussion > Select A State Forum: > VERMONT > News Bulletin
Message Icon Topic: Vt. among best prepared for swine flu epidemic Post Reply Post New Topic
Author Message
mamamichele
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: June 16 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3229
Quote mamamichele Replybullet Topic: Vt. among best prepared for swine flu epidemic
    Posted: December 16 2009 at 5:50am
MONTPELIER – Vermont was among eight states leading the nation in emergency preparedness following the swine flu outbreak, according to a study released Tuesday.

"Ready or Not? Protecting the Public's Health from Diseases, Disasters and Bioterrorism" was conducted for the seventh year by the Trust for America's Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The study found that the H1N1, or swine flu, outbreak has exposed serious problems in the nation's emergency preparedness, a problem exacerbated by the current economic crisis.

"This report has always been and will be a call to action," said Irwin Redlener, Director of the National Center for Disaster Preparedness in a conference call with the media on Tuesday. He said the United States has made progress since Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast and the terrorist attacks on U.S. soil on Sept. 11, 2001.

But, Redlener added, "We're a long way from saying the U.S. is secure and safe from a wide range of threats. We are simply not ready yet."

The study looked at 10 indicators of public emergency readiness and found that Vermont and seven other states have achieved those indicators. The other states were Arkansas, Delaware, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, North Dakota and Texas. Twenty states scored six or less out of 10 key indicators, and nearly two-thirds scored seven or less. Montana had the lowest score at three out of 10.

"The H1N1 outbreak has vividly revealed existing gaps in public health emergency preparedness," said Richard Hamburg, deputy director of TFAH, during the call. With the swine flu outbreak waning, Hamburg said, the country cannot "let down our defenses.

"In fact, it's time to double down and provide a sustained investment in the underlying infrastructure, so we will be prepared for the next emergency and the one after that," he said.

Among the 10 indicators: Whether states had purchased adequate H1N1 vaccine, kept adequate records of available hospital beds, maintained adequate public health staffing, maintained public health funding from 2007 through 2009, and more.

The one area where Vermont fell short was meeting a certain standard for medical volunteers in an emergency.

This marked the third year in a row that Vermont has met nine of the 10 indicators, said Vermont Health Commissioner Wendy Davis.

"The report recognizes that the arrival of the 2009 H1N1 influenza in North America was a daunting test of every state's capacity to effectively respond to a public health threat," Davis said in a statement following news of the TFAH report. "We can be proud of our ranking this year, but there is always more work to do."

Hamburg and Redlener said they worry that states will reduce public health staffing and emergency preparedness in light of the current fiscal crisis, and that states must not simply respond to individual crises, such as the swine flu outbreak, but look ahead for comprehensive emergency planning for any unexpected event.

The report calls for changes to strengthen public emergency preparedness, including modernizing flu vaccine production, adequate funding of these efforts, improved hospital preparedness and community readiness, , and more.

"H1N1, like Katrina, should be a wake-up call for politicians and the public," Redlener said Tuesday. Unfortunately, he added, public officials see these events "more like snooze alarms than wake up calls. "We then just drift back into a state of complacency," he said.
MamamicheleTN
IP IP Logged
Penham
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar
Chief Moderator

Joined: April 26 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2055
Quote Penham Replybullet Posted: December 16 2009 at 3:21pm
Nice to see my state, Oklahoma and 2 of the surrounding states, Arkansas and Texas are in the top 8 states for emergency preparedness.
IP IP Logged
Gexydaf
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar
Washington Volunteer

Joined: April 26 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 891
Quote Gexydaf Replybullet Posted: December 20 2010 at 2:18pm

Vt. scores high in emergency report


Wednesday December 15, 2010

BRATTLEBORO -- Vermont slid one notch in an annual national report on emergency preparedness, but still scored among the highest in the nation.

In the eighth annual "Ready or Not?" report, which is published by The Trust For America’s Health, Vermont met eight out of 10 indicators in how the state is prepared for a public health emergency.

Last year Vermont scored nine out of 10 on the scale.

Only three states scored a perfect 10, and 11 states missed one indicator.

Vermont was one of 18 states to meet eight of the 10 indicators.

"We should be proud that we were one of 32 states to meet eight out of 10 indicators, but we always want to be on top of these lists and be one of the best in the country," said Chip Deasy, interim emergency preparedness chief at the Vermont Department of Public Health. "We are always working to improve our emergency preparedness."

The report found that nationally, more states are improving their emergency preparedness,

The authors found that the events of Sept. 11, 2001, along with anthrax threats and the response to the H1N1 flu pandemic, forced every state to test and improve its emergency health systems.

States overall improved their systems and no state scored lower than five on the 10-point scoring system.

But across the country, budget cuts are threatening those gains and Vermont is no different.

According to the report, Vermont saw a 2.5 percent decrease in its funding for public health services form 2009 to 2010.

On the list of 33 states that saw a cut in funding, Vermont actually was on the low side, with some public health departments contending with double-digit decreases.

"Every reduction in public health expenditures make it more difficult to achieve our goals," said Deasy.

On top of tight state budgets, federal support is also being cut.

The report found that across the nation, investment in emergency preparedness has decreased by $425 billion since 2009, and federal funding has dropped by 27 percent since 2005.

"There is an emergency for emergency health preparedness in the United States," said Jeff Levi, executive director of The Trust For America’s Health. "This year the Great Recession is taking its toll on emergency health preparedness. Unfortunately the recent and continued budget cuts will exacerbate the vulnerable areas in U.S. crisis response capabilities and have the potential to reverse the progress we have made over the last decade."

Along with losing a point for cutting its budget, Vermont also was one of six states that was not able to notify key personnel about emergency exercises or incidents within 60 minutes on at east two different occasions.

Vermont was able to meet that target last year.

"By failing to prepare you are preparing to fail."
-- Ben Franklin
IP IP Logged
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum